Just think of it. 2000 years. That is how long Judas has been waiting to have his name cleared. Almost all scholars consider Luke 6:16 the strongest piece of evidence against him. That verse is the only place in all the Gospels which uses prodotes, the Greek word for traitor, to describe Judas. But it is both illogical and immoral to use this evidence that way. In a court of law today, it would be called leaping to a conclusion. The witness claiming this would be instructed to testify only to concrete facts (what they saw or heard). And just to be perfectly clear, for example, testifying that the defendant murdered the victim is also leaping to a conclusion. We need the details of how it was done.